Integrated pest management resources for Michigan Michigan State University home IPM Michigan home

Search

Christmas trees
Field crops
Fruit
Home and yard
Nursery and landscape
Turfgrass
Vegetable


Diagnostic Services
Soil/Plant Nutrient Lab
Enviro-weather
Regional IPM Center
Pesticide safety
Organic: New Ag Network
Invasive species
Sustainable ag & food systems


MSU ANR departments
MSU Extension

Site index
Contacts/permissions

2007 MSU IPM Program Annual Report
Published in spring 2008

bullet
Welcome message
bulletAbout our funding
bulletPutting the “integrated” in IPM: our 2007 projects
bulletEnviro-weather bolstering weather-based information for pest managers and others
bulletComing soon: an IPM grape grower guide
bulletTart cherry project receives renewed funding for transition to reduced-risk pest management
bulletResearch and extension helps organic farmers evaluate flaming weeds
bulletMore IPM: Collaboration spreads success with conservation programs to other states
bulletBuilding web resources: IPM is just a click away
bulletThe story that went hog-wild - and more about 2007
bulletLizotte accepts position at Northwest Michigan Horticultural Research Station
bullet
Jenkins begins new small fruit position
Annual Report printed version cover
Welcome to the MSU Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program’s annual report for 2007. We are proud to be part of MSU’s effort to develop and implement IPM to address the critical needs of Michigan’s plant production and processing industries. We strive to promote IPM as a plant protection and resource conservation tool. This theme is in keeping with that of our USDA CSREES partner, and matches goals of our major state partner, Project GREEEN. As part of Project GREEEN, we are charged to integrate our efforts within MSU “to develop and implement improved management programs that increase profitability while reducing undesirable environmental impacts and improving food safety.”

You will see this theme carried through our work highlighted here and in our collaborative efforts detailed in our list of active grants and sponsored projects. We have honed this focus through the years working with commodity, agency and institution partners. Special thanks to those that sit on our advisory board.

Last, you may have noticed the new format of this report. Our printed annual report is full of color and hits the highlights of our work in 2007. The printed version highlights the articles and brings the reader here to the web site for more in-depth reading.


Mike Brewer
Mike Brewer, IPM Coordinator
More info:
bullet
About MSU IPM Program
bulletMSU IPM Program Staff

Did you receive our printed report? We'd like your feedback through a four- question survey.
back to top
 
IPM Advisory Board

Specialty crops
:
John Bakker, IPM Alliance Michigan Asparagus Advisory Board; and Dave Smith, IPM Alliance, Michigan Vegetable Council

Field Crops: Keith Reinholt, Michigan Soybean Association; and Amy Garrison, Michigan Corn Marketing Program

Michigan Department of Agriculture:
Gina Davis and Ken Rauscher

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality: Terri Novak

MSU Department of Entomology: Larry Gut

MSU Department of Plant Pathology:
Ray Hammerschmidt

MSU Department of Crop and Soil Sciences:
Jim Kells

MSU Extension: Sally Stubby and Larry Olsen

About our funding

Major base budget contributors are Michigan’s Project GREEEN and USDA CSREES Extension IPM. Sponsored projects are crucial in expanding the depth of our work. Darker shading in the pie chart indicates projects with IPM as project leader. Lighter shading is for projects where IPM staff are team members.

2007 IPM funding pie chart
The table below breaks down the 2007 IPM funding budget portrayed in the above pie chart.
Fund source IPM Role 2007
CSREES Extension IPM base budget $169,000
Project GREEEN base budget $203,700
Grants    
Federal grant Team leader* $374,103
Federal grant Team member* $1,278,961
Project GREEEN Team leader $61,947
Project GREEEN Team member $86,569
Project GREEEN/MAES/MSUE - Enviroweather
  Team leader $83,000
  Team member $106,000
State agency Team leader $6,960
Other (industry, NGOs) Team leader $94,472
  Team member $44, 311
Sub-total Team leader $620,482
Sub-total Team member $1,515,841
*Team leader indicates projects initiated by IPM staff. Team member indicates a project initiated by another unit with IPM staff involvement. The above table does not reflect ICM educator activities.
 
 
back to top
   
Putting the “integrated” in IPM: our 2007 projects

It might involve cucumbers, soybeans, Christmas trees or blueberries. The pests range from aphids and beetles to scab and Canada thistle. The collaborators are farmers, scientists, Extension educators or maybe a commodity association executive. The solutions could be biopesticides, fire or biological control to name a few. The IPM Program worked on over 50 extension and applied research projects in 2007. See the project list with team members (view pdf file).
back to top
   
Enviro-weather bolstering weather-based information for pest managers and others

Weather can vary greatly over time and space in Michigan, including extreme conditions such as drought, floods and large temperature fluctuations. Regardless of the conditions, weather affects many routine decisions in the state’s agricultural and natural resources industries. These decisions have major impact on farmers’ and others’ profit, availability of high quality reasonably priced food and safeguarding of our natural resources.


The technology for making weather-based decisions and people’s interest in adopting it is constantly changing. The MSU IPM Program joined with the MSU Climatological Resources Program to reinvigorate the system of weather-based information delivery. Beginning with assessing needs at a stakeholders’ conference in October 2005, the two programs developed a new web-based interface and identified staff to support it including hiring Mark Trent as the new Enviro-weather’s coordinator. The Michigan Agriculture Experiment Station, MSU Extension, and Project GREEEN have become major contributors to enhance connections to new research and extension. Support from other sources including industry and private individuals are significant. Seven self-identified work groups are tailoring information to meet specific industry needs. Many of the current products under development are for pest management. In 2007, www.enviroweather.msu.edu finished its first full season with a growing array of products and published its first annual report at: http://www.enviroweather.msu.edu/news/Enviro-weatherReport2007.pdf
Michigan Great Lakes
Weather effects from the Great Lakes are evident in this satellite view of Michigan.
Partners
Michigan Agriculture Experiment Station
Michigan Climatological Resource Program
MSU Departments of: Geography, Biosystems XXEngineering, Horticulture, Crop and Soil XXX XXSciences, Plant Pathology, Entomology

MSU Extension
MSU IPM Program
Project GREEEN

For more information, contact:
Mark Trent, trentm@msu.edu



back to top
   
Coming soon: an IPM grape grower guide

A recent industry study reports that demand for wine grapes grown in Michigan is booming and Michigan grapes continue to be a major source of grape juice in the United States. More than 800,000 tourists visited Michigan's 50 wineries in 2005, with an overall direct effect on the economy of $8.6 million. These wineries use all or mostly locally grown fruit to make wines that won more than 600 medals in 2006 at national and international competitions.

Concord and Niagara are Michigan's dominant grape varieties, the majority of which is used for non-fermented products such as Welch's grape juice. The impact of the grape juice industry on the Michigan economy is estimated at $503 million per year.

Grape growers and processors are looking for sustainable, integrated practices. IPM and the MSU small fruit entomology and plant pathology programs are developing a guidebook to help Michigan grape growers with selecting and documenting IPM practices for their vineyards. This effort is in response to grower and industry interest in site-specific planning and assessment. The growers want information that is adaptable for local pest, crop, and environmental characteristics and comparisons of different management options. Based on grower surveys, we are focusing on planning and management that allows growers to compare their current practices to other available IPM options. The guide will have extensive links to the pest identification, biology and management information found at www.grapes.msu.edu and the other on-line grower assistance found at www.ipm.msu.edu

Recently, our industry partners, the National Grape Cooperative and the Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council, suggested a collaboration that will further enhance the usefulness of the new guide. We will be working with the Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) to ensure their environmental risk assessment products and the IPM grape grower guide work together.  Growers will be able to step through the MAEAP assessment tool to identify relative risks in their operations and then step through the IPM guide to evaluate their options to reduce risk while maintaining the high quality pest management needed in this industry. The site-specific grower guides will be helpful in fulfilling the options and requirements of state and USDA programs such as MAEAP and NRCS conservation programs. We envision the grape guide will serve as a template for other commodities and crop management tactics.
                                                                                        
We thank the grape growers and industry for their voice in developing this new tool for IPM planning, and also Project GREEEN for its sponsorship.

Vineyard
Partners
Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program
Michigan Grape and Wine Industry XX XXCouncil
MSU IPM Program
MSU Small Fruit Entomology
MSU Small Fruit Plant Pathology
National Grape Cooperative



For more information, contact:
Paul Jenkins, jenki132@msu.edu
back to top
     
Tart cherry project received funding for transition of reduced-risk pest management

The $1.6 million Tart Cherry Integrated Orchard Management project funded through USDA’s Risk Avoidance Mitigation Program (RAMP) completed its fourth and final field season in 2007. The project team has succeeded in securing a second RAMP grant funded at $1.5 million to continue its work of helping the cherry industry transition to OP-alternatives and reduced-risk controls to manage key pests, develop resistance management strategies, investigate cherry tree host plant resistance, and to develop reliable measures of the ecological consequences of orchard management changes.

According to the project manager, IPM integrator David Epstein, the funding of a second RAMP project immediately following the original is unusual and is a powerful testimony to the effectiveness of the partnership between the cherry industry and researchers at Michigan State University, Utah and Wisconsin. Lead project investigator Mark Whalon reports that the project’s findings were instrumental in USEPA’s decision to give the tart cherry industry an extension until 2012 to transition away from AZM to a more workable OP-alternative IPM program. The funding provided for the second RAMP through September 2010 will support continued collaboration in best methods to structure cherry pest management programs of the near future.

Read the 2008 report from the first RAMP at: http://www.ipm.msu.edu/tartcherry.htm

Cherries
For more information, contact:
Dave Epstein, epstei10@msu.edu
Partners
Mark Whalon, Principle Investigator
whalon@msu.edu        
Dave Epstein, Project manager
epstei10@msu.edu
Erin Lizotte, NW MI Hort. Research Station, District Educator taylo548@msu.edu
back to top
     
Research and extension helps organic farmers evaluate flaming weeds

The Field Crop IPM team has been working with organic farmers for more than 10 years. Weed control in organic farming systems continues to be the most prominent pest problem for these farmers. Since many of the Michigan farmers were using flaming for early weed control, our organic advisory group recommended that MSU IPM initiate research on controlling weeds with fire. Three years ago at the MSU W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Field crops IPM specialist Dale Mutch organized the purchase of a flamer to evaluate and compare flaming weeds to rotary hoeing weeds in corn and soybean organic systems. In January 2008, Mutch’s team published Flaming as a Method of Weed Control in Organic Farming Systems (MSU Extension bulletin E-3038) with the results of our two years of trials.

This publication can be used throughout the North Central Region by organic farmers growing corn. Even though several farmers in Michigan use fire to control weeds in soybeans, there is a fine line between successful weed control and killing the soybeans. For this reason, the researchers only recommend using flame weed control on corn. Corn’s growing point is below the soil surface when flaming weeds, and therefore, very little injury results from this IPM method.

The first use of this publication was at the Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service (MOSES) Organic Farming Conference this past February. It was also presented in early March where Dale Mutch was a guest speaker on weed control in organic field crops at the Michigan Organic Conference.
Flaming weeds bulletin.
Bulletin on flaming weeds.
Farmer flaming weeds.
Technician Todd Martin demonstrates using cross-flaming in organic corn. In this system of flaming, the torches are staggered to avoid interference with the opposite burner’s flame.
This bulletin can be purchased through the MSUE bulletin office at 517-353-6740.
Dale R. Mutch, District Extension Specialist.
Partners
Kellogg Biological Station
MSU Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
MSU Extension
MSU IPM Program
Project GREEEN

For more information contact: Dale Mutch mutch@msu.edu

back to top  
 
More IPM: collaboration spreads success with conservation programs to other states

Here in Michigan, the momentum continues as more growers use the USDA conservation program EQIP to assist them in implementing conservation-focused IPM. There has been a 15-fold increase in funds devoted to IPM implementation statewide from 2002 ($75,000) to 2007 ($1.15 million). Growers are implementing a number of IPM tactics from adding sensing technology and shields to sprayers, to utilizing reduced-risk pesticides. A new 2007 report detailing activities in Michigan is linked at: www.ipm.msu.edu/farmbill.htm. We’d like to give special thanks to all that have contributed to the project, including Michigan NRCS for recognizing IPM as a joint resource conservation and plant protection tool. These partners are listed in the acknowledgements of at the end of the report.

Regionally, beginning in fall 2006, MSU IPM Coordinator Mike Brewer worked with the IPM Institute of North America’s Tom Green to setup a regional work group on conservation programs and IPM party sponsored by the North Central IPM Center. The work group brings together university IPM staffs with NRCS staff in the north central states to identify means to increase adoption of IPM through NRCS conservation programs. The work group first met in November 2006 and has continued its interactions via conference calls in 2007. States like Michigan and Wisconsin that have been building collaborations with NRCS share their experiences for potential adaptation by the other states. The work group has developed state and regional aids for learning about EQIP and how to participate which are accessible at a website hosted by the MSU IPM Program at: www.ipm.msu.edu/work-group/home.htm. You are welcome to redistribute and reprint any of this information.

Partners
Environmental Protection Agency
IPM Alliance
IPM Institute of North America Center
XXfor Agricultural Partnerships
MI Agricultural Experiment Station
MI NRCS state and district offices
MSU Extension
MSU IPM Program
Natural Resources Defense Council
North Central IPM Center
Our sister land grant IPM Programs
Project GREEEN

For more information, contact: Michael Brewer, brewerm@msu.edu

On the national front, a symposium on this topic was presented at the Entomological Society of America’s national meeting in December 2007. The symposium was jointly hosted by MSU IPM and Penn State IPM with presenters from Michigan, Pennsylvania and California land grant universities, non-profit grower and environmental organizations (Center for Agricultural Partnerships and Natural Resources Defense Council), and the USDA NRCS and CSREES. Speakers presented both historical and present day status of financial assistance provided to growers to implement IPM and showed how states like Michigan are leading the charge to heighten grower use of the program. The value of joining the educational strengths of IPM research and extension at land grant universities with the natural resource assessment and program assistance strengths of USDA NRCS was quite clear.
Farm Bill map 2

During the 1996 Farm Bill cycle (1997-2002), the percentage of EQIP funding provided to the IPM-related NRCS practices among the states was generally low (0.77 % nation-wide) and skewed toward minimal allocation levels (35 states at less than 1%).

*Data source: USDA NRCS EQIP national office.

Farm Bill map By 2005-2006, EQIP financial obligations in implementing these IPM-related NRCS practices increased nationwide to 2.8% average, with Michigan now in the top ten states sponsoring IPM as a joint resource conservation and plant protection tool.

*Data source: USDA NRCS EQIP national office.
back to top
 
Building web resources: IPM is just a click away

The IPM Program has hosted a web site since 1996. The newest efforts in 2007 included:

Who's on the Internet?
A February-March 2007 survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found 71% of American adults – 60% in rural areas – have access and use the Internet. They also are getting faster, better connections that make use easier: 47% have broadband connections at home, up from 29% in January 2005.
back to top
 
The story that went hog-wild – and more about 2007

The IPM Program has learned something new about the news media: They can’t resist a project that involves little pigs keeping worms out of the all-American apple. In 2006, apple grower Jim Koan asked IPM integrator Dave Epstein to help him explore grazing pigs in his organic apple block to eat fallen apples that harbor plum curculio larvae. Dave, with pork specialist Dale Rozeboom, is researching this innovative approach to managing an apple pest while producing organic bacon. “We’ve only had one season for testing our hypothesis,” notes Epstein. “It was pretty successful, but we certainly aren’t ready to tell the world to put pigs in every orchard.”

The Michigan press got wind of the research and enjoyed farmer Jim Koan’s colorful way of talking about the work. The Associated Press picked up the story and within a couple of days, it was spanning the globe with web postings by Newsweek, the Seattle Times, Australia’s Sydney Morning Herald and hundreds of thousands of others. Google “Hogs help battle beetle” to view some of these stories.

Listen to the NPR interview with Dave Epstein and Jim Koan about their project. You must have Windows Media Player to listen. To download, click here.

Epstein says he doesn't’t consider it the most important work he’s ever done, but there must be something about pigs! Thanks to the USDA Integrated Organic Program for initially funding this work.The pigs are just one of several projects from 2007 that we covered in our fall newsletter. In that newsletter, you can also read about:

  • New agro-ecology book looks at farming systems
  • Enviro-weather helps apple growers with fire blight
  • Growing native plants to enhance beneficial insects
  • Trap crops and polyculture as management tools
  • Whole farm management of codling moth.
Newsweek
Read the article at Newsweek.
Dave Epstein holding a piglet.
Dave Epstein holding a piglet.
back to top
 
Lizotte accepts position at Northwest Michigan Horticultural Research Station

I wanted to take this opportunity to introduce myself to those of you I haven’t had the chance to meet. I am excited to begin my new position as the Integrated Fruit Practices and Pest Management Educator at the Northwest Michigan Horticultural Research Station (NWMHRS) in Traverse City. Fruit production in Michigan is truly unique and offers its own set of challenges, but the solidarity of the grower community in Michigan and their commitment to the future of the industry promises to offer me a unique opportunity in my new position. I look forward to contributing to the success of the fruit industry in whatever way I can.

Erin Lizotte.
Erin Lizotte.
I received my bachelor’s degree in forestry from Michigan Technological University in 2005 and went on to work as a research technician at the NWMHRS upon graduation. After five months at the station, I was invited to join Dr. George Sundin’s tree fruit pathology lab at Michigan State University where I worked towards my master’s degree investigating fungicide resistance in pathogens of cherry. I completed my master’s degree in plant pathology in 2007.

I began the new position of IFP/IPM Educator on January 1, 2008. In this position, I will be providing leadership and focus for fruit pest and crop management in northern Michigan. I am responsible for developing and conducting research and integrated crop management training programs to address the needs of the Michigan fruit industry and to facilitate the adoption of integrated management strategies into commercial fruit production.  I also have responsibilities in research and joint outreach programming with other MSU fruit experiment stations.

I look forward to meeting you all over the coming months and can’t wait to see the cherry trees bloom. – Erin Lizotte,  Integrated Fruit Practices and Pest Management Educator
.
back to top
 
Jenkins begins new small fruit position

I’m pleased to join MSU as the new Small Fruit Education Coordinator. My position, which began January 1, 2008, is housed in the MSU IPM Program. I have statewide responsibilities for coordinating extension and applied research efforts to address the pest and production priorities of Michigan’s small fruit industries (e.g. grapes, blueberries). My focus will be to support small fruit commodity organizations, MSU extension educators, and MSU researchers in developing, producing and delivering outreach programming. I will also facilitate communications and collaborations between MSU researchers, county/district extension educators, industry partners, growers and related clientele. My appointment is 75 percent outreach and 25 percent research with half the funding coming from the MSU College of Agriculture and Natural Resources and the rest from extramural resources.

I am a native of Grand Rapids, Michigan, and have been at MSU since 2001. Prior to my new position, I was a graduate research assistant for Rufus Isaacs (Entomology) and a research technician for John Wise (Trevor Nichols Research Complex/Entomology) and Christine Vandervoort (Pesticide Analytical Laboratory/Plant Pathology). My research focused on grapes and blueberries, so I look forward to continued collaboration with the MSU small fruit team.
Paul Jenkins.
Starting out, half of my time is committed to bringing educational programming to Michigan winemakers. The need to provide enology education and technical assistance has been acknowledged by both the Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council and MSU as an essential step in the growth of the Michigan wine industry. I can be contacted at: Michigan State University, B18 Food Safety & Toxicology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824; tel: 517-432-7751; email: jenki132@msu.edu. – Paul Jenkins, Small Fruit Education Coordinator.
back to top
MSU IPM Program
Generating partnerships for better pest management in Michigan.

Who we serve
we work with growers, consultants and their commodity groups to solve pest management problems in fruit, landscape, nursery, field crops, vegetables, and forestry-related plant production systems.

Agency partners
To serve stakeholders, we collaborate with state and federal agencies such as in Michigan departments of Agriculture and Environmental Quality, the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service.

MSU Partners
We work with MSU field staff and campus faculty within the departments of Plant Pathology, Entomology, Crop & Soil Sciences, Geography, Horticulture, Forestry, MSU Diagnostic Services, MSU Extension, the Michigan Agricultural Experimentation Station, and Project GREEEN. Our home department is Entomology.

How we collaborate

We work with specialists and educators in research, demonstration and educational projects and help deliver their findings to IPM practitioners. This work is often coordinated through MSU's Area of Expertise teams.
MSU IPM Program staff
Michael J. Brewer - IPM coordinator.
Joy Landis - Assistant IPM coordinator and communications manager.
Andrea Buchholz - Communications specialist.
David Epstein - Tree fruit IPM integrator.
Paul Jenkins, Small fruit education coordinator
Dale Mutch - Cover crops/ IPM specialist.
Erin Lizotte - Integrated fruit practices and pest management educator. Read more about the staff and program.

Affiliates

Integrated Crop Management (ICM) educators: Jim Breinling, Amy Irish-Brown, Mira Danilovich, Dean Krauskopf and Jill O’Donnell.

Enviro-weather staff
Mark Trent, Jeff Andresen, Steve Marquie, Tracy Aichele, Jim Brown, Aaron Pollyea.
back to top
The MSU IPM Program maintains this site as an access point to pest management information at MSU. The IPM Program is administered within the Department of Entomology, fueled by research from the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, delivered to citizens through MSU Extension, and proud to be a part of Project GREEEN.
Email
the web developer.
06/06/08